Shroud of Turin Carbon 14 Madness

Strange Images on the Turin Shroud

The Shroud's Journey: Edessa to Turin

Second Face on The Shroud of Turin

Shroud Research 1898 to 2005

Description of the Shroud of Turin

Shroud of Turin Skeptical Spectacle
 

Shroud of Turin Skeptical Spectacle > Edessa to Turin > Shroud in Turin

shroud at Turin

Previous

NEW 2005 SHROUD OF TURIN BROUHAHA: SCIENCE vs PAPAL CUSTODIAN

Next
   


Turin Cathedral - Home of the Shroud

In 1578, the Shroud moved to its final city home: Turin. Cardinal Charles Borromeo, in that year, was to travel on foot from Milan to Chambery to give thanks to the Shroud following the end of the plague in Milan. To prevent the rigors of a journey across the Alps, Duke Emanuel Philibert had the cloth moved to Turin.

In September 1939, the Shroud was secretly moved to the Benedictine Abbey of Montevergine, northeast of Naples to protect it. It remained there until 1946.

In November 1973, experts were brought together to secretly examine the Shroud. It was then Max Frei, a Swiss criminologist, took samples of surface dust and pollen and  Gilbert Raes took a sample of material from an edge of the Shroud. The Raes sample would later prove instrumental in helping to prove that the carbon 14 dating samples were invalid.

In October 1978, a comprehensive five day examination of the Shroud was undertaken by members of the Shroud of Turin Research Project (STURP) and others in the Hall of Visiting Princes within Turin's Royal Palace. During this time the Shroud photographed in with visible light, low-power X-rays and narrow band ultraviolet (UV) light. Dozens of pieces of adhesive tape samples were taken to collect dust, pollen, loose fibers and other particulate matter from the Shroud. A side edge was unstitched and a viewing apparatus was nserted between the Shroud and its backing cloth to examine the underside, which has not been seen in over 400 years. Baima Bollone also obtained sample of Shroud's bloodstain by disentangling warp and weft threads in the area of the image small of the back.

In April 1988,  a sample of the cloth is cut for the carbon 14 dating.

During June and July 2002, a group of textile experts undertake a restoration of the Shroud.  The following is quoted from Barrie Schwortz' website:

A small group of textile experts, headed by Mechtild Fleury-Lemberg of Switzerland, perform a dramatic and radical "restoration" of the Shroud under the auspices of the Archbishop of Turin and his advisors at the Turin Center for Shroud Studies, and with the full permission of the Vatican. They remove the thirty patches sewn into the cloth by Poor Clare Nuns in 1534 to repair burn holes from the 1532 fire. They remove the backing cloth (frequently referred to as the "Holland Cloth") that was sewn onto the back of the Shroud in 1534 to strengthen the fire damaged relic. They photograph the hidden back side of the cloth and then re-attach a new, whiter linen backing cloth. They use lead weights suspended from the edges of the Shroud to "flatten" many of the creases in the cloth and apply steam to certain areas to help accomplish this. They handle the cloth without gloves or special clothing. They scrape away the charred edges of all the burned areas and collect the scrapings into small containers. During a continuous period of thirty-two days, they expose the cloth to significant amounts of potentially damaging light and the polluted air of Turin. They perform this restoration in secret, without consulting any of the world's Shroud experts (including most of their own advisors) that could have contributed important scientific guidance to ensure that no valuable scientific or historical data was lost or damaged during the restoration. They set off a firestorm of controversy, criticism, debate and recrimination that ultimately engulfs, polarizes and divides the Shroud research community. For more information on how this important event unfolded, see the 2002 Website Newspage. You will also want to read the Comments On The Restoration page, where fourteen noted Shroud experts express their own opinions of the restoration.

Previous Next

BACK TO TOP