Shroud of Turin and the Skeptical Inquirer  > FAQ

Skeptical Inquirer's Shroud of Turin Questions

Return to List of Skeptical Questions

The real skeptical inquirer wonders . . .

How do we know that the blood on the Shroud is real? Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal (1981)

Using ultraviolet-visible reflectance and fluorescence spectra, S. F. Pellicori analyzed the spectral properties of the Shroud's image color, the blood, and the non-image areas. These are quantitative measurements. They are based on reflectance and not a person's visual interpretation of indefinite splotches of different optical density. The spectra carry much important information, and they can not be ignored. This is documented in Applied Optics (1980). pp. 1913-1920]. These show the properties of the

Alan Adler, an expert on porphyrins, the types of colored compounds seen in blood, chlorophyll, and many other natural products concluded that the blood is real. In collaboration with John Heller, the conclusions that the blood is real was published in the peer-reviewed scientific journal Applied Optics (also 1980). The heme was converted into its parent porphyrin, and this was confirmed with spectral analysis.

Baima Bollone also found both the heme porphyrin ring of blood and the globulin in flakes of blood from Shroud samples, independently confirming the work of Adler and Heller.

In addition, the x-ray-fluorescence spectra showed excess iron in blood areas, as expected for blood. Microchemical tests for proteins were positive in blood areas but not in any other parts of the Shroud.

Qualitative chemical analyses are designed to detect the presence of specific substances. If they detect one, it is almost certainly present. Such tests are designed to have no or few false positive results. The tests can be repeated with fresh reagents by independent observers, and the results should agree. There are usually multiple tests for the same compounds or functional groups. Detection limits are generally known. If a material is not detected, it can probably safely be rejected. Analytical results can be used objectively to test many different hypotheses.

Chemical tests by E. J. Jumper, A. D. Adler, J. P. Jackson, S. F. Pellicori, J. H. Heller, and J. R. Druzik are documented in "A comprehensive examination of the various stains and images on the Shroud of Turin," ACS Advances in Chemistry, Archaeological Chemistry (1984)

Other material is provided by J. H. Heller and A. D. Adler in "A Chemical Investigation of the Shroud of Turin," Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal and by L. A. Schwalbe and R. N. Rogers, Analytica Chimica Acta (1982)

See:     What else can be observed about the bloodstains?

Return to List of Skeptical Questions

Shroud of Turin and the Skeptical Inquirer


Fact: The 1988 carbon 14 dating used invalid samples snipped from a discrete medieval repair. Furthermore, kinetics constants for the loss of vanillin from lignin indicates that the cloth is at least twice as old as the dates determined by the carbon 14 dating with the faulty samples.

By some estimates, from examination of documenting photographs, there is sufficient new thread (about 60%) to allow adjusting the cloth's date to approximately the first century.

Fact: The images are formed by a brownish, complex conjugated carbon substance within a carbohydrate layer of starch fractions no thicker than 1/100 the diameter of a human hair.

The images are probably the product of an amino/carbonyl reaction.

Fact: The bloodstains are real blood. The blood is unusually red for old blood.

The blood probably stayed red and did not turn black as blood normally does because trace chemicals found in the starch fractions are hemolytic. Also, the blood is rich in bilirubin, a bile pigment produced when a human body is under severe traumatic stress. Bilirubin is bright red and stays red.

Fact: There is a faint, superficial face image on the back of the cloth.

This supports the hypothesis of an amino/carbonyl reaction.

Fact: There are sufficient descriptive historical records to suggest that the Shroud of Turin is the Edessa cloth (ca. before 544 to 944 CE) and the Bucoleon Palace grave cloth of Constantinople (ca. 944 - 1204).

Fragmentary evidence suggests that the Edessa Cloth originated in Jerusalem in the 1st century and that it is the burial cloth of Jesus of Nazareth.