Shroud of Turin and the Skeptical Inquirer  > FAQ

Skeptical Inquirer's Shroud of Turin Questions

Return to List of Skeptical Questions

The skeptical inquirer considers . . .

What is proposed in terms of miraculous image formation?

There are many who believe that the images are the byproduct of the Resurrection of Jesus; that somehow, the miracle impressed the image on the cloth. Most of these speculations propose that radiation or elementary particles caused the image. Others suggest plasma from an electrical corona discharge. Such a miracle cannot be scientifically verified. But beyond this, it is doubtful from a chemical point of view.

Chemist Ray Rogers (see: Ray Rogers FAQ) writes:

The primary effect of all kinds of radiation is to heat the material it hits. This statement includes electromagnetic radiation (visible, ultraviolet, and infrared radiation); ionizing particles such as protons, electrons, and alpha particles; and non-ionizing particles such as neutrons. You can feel the heat when you hold a lump of plutonium, a flask of tritium, or a recently irradiated accelerator target. Intense irradiation can cause enough heat to explode explosives and burn metals (think of laser effects).

Cellulose molecules are folded back and forth in a fairly regular arrangement, and they show the properties of crystallinity. This is called a "fibrillar structure." When you rotate the stage of a petrographic microscope with crossed polarizers while looking at a linen fiber, straight lengths change from black through colored to black again every 90 degrees. The fiber is birefringent and has an ordered structure.

When cellulose fibers are heated enough to color them, whether by conduction, convection, or radiation of any kind, water is eliminated from the structure (the cellulose is "dehydrated"). When water is eliminated, C-OH chemical bonds are broken. The C? free radicals formed are extremely reactive, and they will combine with any material in their vicinity. In cellulose, other parts of the cellulose chains may be the closest reactants. The chains crosslink. Crosslinking changes the crystal structure of the cellulose, and you can see the effect with a polarizing microscope.

When cellulose starts to scorch (dehydrate and crosslink), its characteristic crystal structure becomes progressively more chaotic. Its birefringence changes, and not all parts of a straight fiber go through clear transitions from dark to light at the same angle. Zones of order get smaller and smaller. It finally takes on the appearance of a pseudomorph and just scatters light. A significantly scorched fiber does not change color as the stage is rotated between crossed polarizers.

The crystal structure of the flax fibers of the Shroud shows the effects of aging, but it has never been heated enough to change the structure. It has never suffered chemically significant irradiation with either protons or neutrons. No type of radiation that could produce either color in the linen fibers or change the 14C content (radiocarbon age) could go unnoticed. All radiation has some kind of an effect on organic materials.

This proves that the image color could not have been produced by thermal or radiation­induced dehydration of the cellulose. Image formation proceeded at normal temperatures in the absence of energetic radiation of any kind.

Even so, strong beliefs persist about radiation from a miracle being the cause of the images. Supporters point to certain x-ray-like impressions of the teeth and the finger bones in the images.

Return to List of Skeptical Questions

Shroud of Turin and the Skeptical Inquirer


Fact: The 1988 carbon 14 dating used invalid samples snipped from a discrete medieval repair. Furthermore, kinetics constants for the loss of vanillin from lignin indicates that the cloth is at least twice as old as the dates determined by the carbon 14 dating with the faulty samples.

By some estimates, from examination of documenting photographs, there is sufficient new thread (about 60%) to allow adjusting the cloth's date to approximately the first century.

Fact: The images are formed by a brownish, complex conjugated carbon substance within a carbohydrate layer of starch fractions no thicker than 1/100 the diameter of a human hair.

The images are probably the product of an amino/carbonyl reaction.

Fact: The bloodstains are real blood. The blood is unusually red for old blood.

The blood probably stayed red and did not turn black as blood normally does because trace chemicals found in the starch fractions are hemolytic. Also, the blood is rich in bilirubin, a bile pigment produced when a human body is under severe traumatic stress. Bilirubin is bright red and stays red.

Fact: There is a faint, superficial face image on the back of the cloth.

This supports the hypothesis of an amino/carbonyl reaction.

Fact: There are sufficient descriptive historical records to suggest that the Shroud of Turin is the Edessa cloth (ca. before 544 to 944 CE) and the Bucoleon Palace grave cloth of Constantinople (ca. 944 - 1204).

Fragmentary evidence suggests that the Edessa Cloth originated in Jerusalem in the 1st century and that it is the burial cloth of Jesus of Nazareth.